ihollywoodchina.com

They invested way too much with one man.

If you look at the income-generation and TV revenues of tournaments with Tiger Woods, they are up to 66% higher than tournaments without Tiger Woods.

That is an enormous gap that was not seen before the late 90’s.

Why hasn’t professional golf built up other stars and personalities who have similar popularity to Tiger Woods? Why has pro golf simply dumped all of its publicity resources onto Tiger, and let the other guys go unnoticed?

This would protect them from downturns when Tiger isn’t on the course.

They don’t know how to do that. Their only business model is "ride the cash cow till he dies. Then resuscitate him, and keep on riding". They found out how bad they were when TW was injured for the last half of ‘08, and they STILL didn’t learn anything. It’s like some kind of weird denial thing.

It doesn’t help that fair-weather fans (not true golf fans, but Tiger-only fans) and most of the media crucify people that either have a negative opinion of Tiger, or aspire to be #1. Once the backlash subsides, they’re basically saying "Screw it, I’ll keep to myself" and that hurts everyone… but it’s understandable. That’s why it seems that there are so many robots on Tour… why say something, when either not enough people are going to care, or you might face some serious heat?

For example if the company faces deficit to their revenues due to some factors such as calamities, having error in their financial statements and other instances…

What could be the best solution that the company will do in order to solve their problem?
What if the company experienced deficit due to calamties? What will be the best solution for it?

Take a good hard look at what expenses can be cut or completely eliminated
Go over your expenses one by one and ask is this expense really necessary to
operate the company if it is not most likely you can do without it.

After going through your expenses look at your payroll and see what personnel
are absolutely necessary to run the company and start getting rid of those
who the company can do without

You’ve got to trim your expenses to what your sales will bear if the
sales are not there you’ve got to keep trimming until you have
some income on your bottom line – -

Stop any travel expenses and only allow this expense if it is absolutely
a must to do so. You can also cut back on hours that the people are
working.

"As for the top line revenues, the client estimated to operate at 50% capacity during the first year, 70% capacity at the second year and 80% capacity thereafter"

thanks
i will answer you question in the same way you answered mine: my nationality has something to do with the human race

It has somthing to do with money lol are you dutch?

There are 3 terms you learn in economics 101. One states that by lowing the price you actually increase total revenues. One states that by lowering the price your total revenues will decrease. The last one states that by lowering the price your total revenues stays the same.

Ronald Reagan didn’t lower the tax rates for fun. He had an economic theory behind it and it does not state that "lowering tax rates always increases tax revenue". That is a misconception by people who don’t understand the theory behind it. Reagan’s tax policy was based on the Laffer curve. I encourage you to look it up. If you lower taxes past a certain point you will lose tax revenue. Also when you are evaluating where you are on the Laffer curve you would not simply pick periods of high economic activity, but ones of lower economic activity as well.

We’re doing an online simulation in my intro to business class and my group’s company is generating some of the highest revenues. But unfortunately, this doesn’t translate to high EPS, ROE, or stock price where we’re seriously lagging behind the other groups. What can/should we do differently to fix this?

Provide high-yield interest-gaining dividends to your clientele base as subsets to irregulatory mutual funds and bonds. This should clear it up.

I need to find some corporate data: net profits after taxes and sales revenues — for a particular corporation.

Is there some sort of database for this? Government database?

I havent decided what corporation, more likely to take whatever is more fruitful with data, if theres a database I can choose outta there.
Can anyone help?

Yahoo Finance. Put in the ticker symbol or the name for the company and look at the income statement. It has to be a public company.

Think about it.

If we make prostitution legal all over the USA, what would happen?

It would be highly regulated, with all sorts of standards. People in the industry would need to purchase licenses, and pay taxe.

There would be far less disease with all the health standards.

The high degree of regulation could help to prevent the involvement of minors on prostitution.

What do you think?

Whether its legal or not it will continue to be present in society. So why not make money off it, while keeping those involved safe?

Should we legalize prostitution?

Having problems getting laid?

Remember when the IRS seized a Nevada brothel because of taxes and ran it bankrupt in only 11 months.

Mike

Federal tax revenues are higher than they were, higher than at any point in history, higher than the CBO projected they would be with the tax cuts, and higher than the CBO projected they would be without the tax cuts. And the Fed has been restrictive, which means it’s not the temporary effect of monetary policy – in fact monetary policy is working AGAINST growth of GDP and the tax base.

Yes we have a deficit and that’s a problem but it results from INCREASED SPENDING, for which BOTH parties are to blame.

And given the increase in revenue, it’s possible that a tax RATE hike would CUT revenue.

How can ANYONE be against making the tax cuts permanent now that they’ve proven to pay for themselves?

It seems to me that this is wishful thinking. It’s far more likely that the increased SPENDING has caused the rise in government collections, as the increased spending, of course, translates into more money pumped into the economy and thus higher incomes for corporations and individuals. Of course, the increase in spending doesn’t cause sufficient increase in revenue to offset the total amount of deficit being created, thus the federal deficit is mushrooming.

It is also interesting to blame BOTH parties for the increase in spending when the Republicans have been in charge of both Congress and the Presidency for some time.

I’ll be happy to vote to make the tax cuts permanent when it is shown that they can be sustained while we address the massive debt burden we are imposing on our children.

What happens when a hospital service’s do not cover their costs?

They they operate at a deficit, start laying off people, and eventually close partially or fully, or got taken over.

The Jpanese konbini (convienience store) system allows anyone to purchase online and then pay for that puchase at their corner c-store. When it was first announced, it seemed rather successful — yet I cannot find any information on the percentage of overall ecommerce revenue that goes through that system.
Well — so far this has been a waste of time. Does Yahoo really hope to make this a real service?

The answer is ‘I don’t know’, but I’d like to. It is certainly not "none" (give me a break!) but my guess is it’s in double figures at least and growing. The place to ask this would be Seven-Eleven Japan or the Japan Credit Card Association.